You are here: Home : Topics A-Z : Regulatory Issues : Article
Full Steam Ahead?
If there's one lesson from Parmalat's implosion, it's that regulatory reform can't wait any longer. Here's how banking and securities watchdogs on both sides of the Atlantic are faring.
Ben McLannahan
CFO Europe Magazine
May 3, 2004
Diplomatic and trade relations between Europe and the US may be somewhat frosty these days, but there's one area where transatlantic bonhomie is at an all-time high: securities regulation. In January William Donaldson, chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), paid a visit to Brussels to meet senior members of the committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), a body of national regulators and the closest thing that the European Union has to an SEC-like watchdog. It was Donaldson's first European tour of duty since assuming the SEC Chairmanship in early 2003. What was striking was that he used the visit to reverse recent unilateralist American policy in securities regulation, fixing his focus firmly on teamwork.
Reforming securities regulation across the EU is far from a done deal. The debate now is whether Europe will end up with too little, too late.
advertisementIn a 3,000-word keynote speech announcing the start of a working relationship with CESR, Donaldson used the word "collaboration" five times and "co-operation" a dozen times. The chairman even hinted at the possibility of mutual recognition, which would allow stocks regulated under European rules to be admitted on US markets.
It was a landmark speech for regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Formerly, any public talk of mutual recognition had been a "complete no-no," notes Paul Arlman, secretary general of the Federation of European Stock Exchanges.
But it didn't come as a complete surprise to Arthur Docters van Leeuwen, who's been chairman of CESR (pronounced "Caesar") since it was founded in 2001 as part of the EU's Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP). A few months earlier he'd met Donaldson and other SEC officials at their headquarters in Washington, DC, where they laid the groundwork for greater co-operation. Yet Docters van Leeuwen was understandably pleased with Donaldson's speech in January. "[His] coming here and using those terms was gratifying," he recalls today from his home in The Hague. As he notes, there's a new-found sense of kinship. "When I asked why we should collaborate on Capitol Hill last October, the best answer came from Maryland Senator Paul Sarbanes: 'We are both big economies but we are connected. We can see that when a few people really misbehave then both markets shiver'."
So does the recent rapprochement mean that CESR is positioning itself to become Europe's de facto SEC? If so, it's a move welcome in many European business circles. In an on online poll in February of CFO Europe readers, nearly 75% of respondents said that Europe needs a single securities market super-regulator.
Others agree. As Jonathan Marsh, head of the financial services and markets group at Hammonds, a UK-based law firm, puts it: "There's more appetite for a pan-European FSA [the UK's enforcer] than just another talking shop for European regulators."
Some critics of the current approach even go so far as to say that the EU's current fragmented approach to regulation, in which individual national regulators have autonomy in implementing European Commission-approved directives, makes it a soft target for corporate malfeasance—Parmalat being the most recent example.
Yet building an SEC-like body for Europe isn't done lightly. The big debate now is whether CESR can, or indeed should, evolve from its current consulting role into an umbrella organisation that has the regulatory might to regain and sustain investor confidence in Europe's capital markets.
Hail CESR
So far, CESR's track record has been promising. Designed to steer the EU through the tricky execution of Baron Lamfalussy's FSAP of 1999, CESR has helped the Commission hammer out a handful of directives that will have a big impact on corporate Europe. For CFOs, the most noteworthy are the Prospectus Directive (whereby when a prospectus for a company issuing equities or bonds is approved in one member state, it will be able to market to investors in all member states) and the Transparency Directive (which aims to standardise the information that issuers must disclose).
- Readers' Comments
Comment on this article...
Related Articles
- How Should Banks Police Their Clients?
May 03, 2004
- Why the Fed Lets Banks Off Easy on Fraud
April 01, 2004
- Good Governance and Global Standards
March 22, 2004
- IRS Cracks Down on Transfer Pricing
March 01, 2004
- Corporate Misdeeds or Criminal Offenses?
April 01, 2003
Inside CFO.com
Top Story
Taxation and RepresentationReader's Favorites
- The Essential Skills
- Today's Accounting Crop: Spoiled Rotten?
- Ready or Not, Here Comes Fair Value
Buyer's Guides and Special Reports
- Best of Careers
- The Greening of Corporate America
Attend A Webcast
- Driving Game-Changing Financial Performance:
A Case Study with MDS Pharma
TAKE A GLOBAL VIEW
CFO.com is pleased to bring you selected coverage from our sister publication CFO Europe. You can find the complete issue each month on the CFO Europe web site.
Visit CFO Europe.com
Related White Papers
- Innovation in Governance, Risk and Compliance
- Reducing Cost and Complexity with Global Governance Controls
- The FASB's Basic Ownership Approach and a Reclassification of Preferred Stock as a Liability
- Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Internal Control Reporting Requirements - Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Section 404 (Fourth Edition)
- 2008 Internal Audit Capabilities and Needs Survey
We Deliver
advertisement
advertisement

Video